Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sarhaddon's avatar

I think the fact that these idiotic, bottom-feeding liberals keep thinking art in the vein of "Piss Christ" is compelling is, paradoxically, proof of how powerful Christianity remains in the Western psyche.

After all, if the cross had no power, why would these moral imbeciles need to rebel against it?

The mode of their rebellion is also informative. A true refutation of Christian symbolism would be to create symbolism (statues and art) that contradicts it, but is equally compelling and beautiful (or moreso). But that is not what we're seeing. These people reveal the limits of their vision and ability in the childish and predictable form their rebellion takes. "Piss Christ" is the ceiling for them.

Frank Bruno's avatar

Jesus Christ did not call His priests to be lukewarm. He said plainly:

“Because you are neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of My mouth” (Rev. 3:16).

When bishops praise what desecrates the Cross,

they do not show compassion — they show cowardice.

If the sacred is not worth defending,then what exactly is your vocation for?When priests cheer blasphemy,they do not reveal sophistication —

they reveal spiritual collapse.

Vienna once built cathedrals that lifted souls to Heaven.

Now clergy stand smiling as Christ is dragged into the gutter.

It is not the world’s mockery that wounds us most — it is the silence of those ordained to defend the holy.

A shepherd afraid to speak for Christ is not a shepherd.

Christ deserves defenders, not curators of blasphemy.

I hope someone writes the ultimate story on how the Jesuits could have drifted so far from the time St. Ignatius formed men who would rather die than allow Christ to be mocked.

St. Michael the Archangel — defend us in this battle.

Christ our King — reign in spite of Your enemies

187 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?