Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Frederica Mathewes-Green's avatar

I just wanted to make a comment about "energy." It's not just a scientific concept, it's Scriptural.

English got the word "energy" from the Greek "energeia," simply adopted it. And St. Paul uses the term and cognates over 30 times, always referring to *spiritual* energies. (Usually energies of God, but sometimes energies of the evil one.) Eg, "God is energizing in you, both to will and to energize for his good pleasure," Philippians 2:13.

The reason that sounds strange to Western ears is that Western theology is based on reading the Bible in Latin.

When St Jerome was translating the Bible from Greek to Latin, around AD 400, there was no Latin equivalent for "energy." So he used instead "operatio," operation. It has a different feeling; it's less energized, to be specific.

For the next thousand years, Western theology was built on the foundation of that Latin translation. Oddly enough, the greatest Western theologians did not read Greek well. St. Augustine disliked Greek as a child and didn't acquire it, St. Gregory the Great gained little Greek despite living 6 years in Constantinople, and St. John Cardinal Newman says of St. Thomas Aquinas: he is “generally supposed [to be] ignorant of Greek,” though “his own words [in the Catena] seem to imply otherwise… he has in several cases quite missed the sense of the Greek.”)

The concept of energy was eliminated. Even today English bibles translated from the Greek will not use "energy" but rather words with the "operatio" sense, like "work." "God is working in you, both to will and to work..." The familiarity with the concept of energy is gone. But it's still there in the Bible.

Orthodoxy is familiar with the Biblical concept of energy, so it doesn't sound New Age to us; it sounds like St. Paul.

Undercurrent's avatar

I’m a parent of autistic twins and have looked into this subject extensively. I’m sad to say it’s facilitated communication repackaged. Rod, I’m begging you to look into the method of spelling 2 communicate with a more skeptical eye. It’s doubly tragic because the family falsely believes they are speaking with the autistic person, and meanwhile the actual communications (ie nonverbal cues) can be ignored and dismissed as apraxia. I’m a devout Catholic and don’t doubt that autistic people are close to God but these messages are almost certainly generated by the “communication partner” subconsciously.

https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/just-believe-strange-story-facilitated-communication

146 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?