Rape Gangs & Britain On The Brink
And: The Pope & Migration; Jacob Boatman's Amazing Story; Culture At The Airport
In Britain, the MP Rupert Lowe, a political Independent, last year raised 600,000 pounds to crowdfund an independent investigation of the Muslim rape gang scandal. Lowe, along with MP Esther McVey, lawyer Graham Smith, and Sammy Woodhouse, a survivor of the rape gangs, heard testimony from other survivors. This was not an official inquiry. Based on the belief that British authorities have systematically tried to downplay the breadth and seriousness of the abuse, for the sake of avoiding conflict with Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities (from which the vast majority of the alleged rapists come), Lowe and his team gathered information independently. Now they are turning it over the to government in the hope that at last, the state will take it seriously. Here is their statement from yesterday. It is very strong stuff:
Tablet writes about it all here, concluding:
Nevertheless, the United Kingdom appears headed for a reckoning over migrant gangs and broader immigration policy. Starmer has moved to curb asylum flows through tighter visa rules and increased deportations, but a recent Guardian poll found 67% of voters believe the immigration crisis has not improved, even though net migration fell 66% from 2024 to 2025, likely meaning that the number of immigrants is so large that natives hardly notice a reduction in even more entering. The same poll found that more than 70% of Britons have little or no confidence in Starmer’s government to address the issue effectively.
For these and other reasons, retired British Col. Richard Kemp told i24News on Thursday that he fears for the country’s future. If the government attempts to confront what he called the “Islamification” of Britain, he argued, millions of British Muslims could revolt. “I think the end result of that is very likely to be civil war in Britain,” he said.
Last summer, B. Duncan Moench, also writing in Tablet, delivered this brutal story about the rape gangs. Excerpts:
The scandal continues to horrify not just because of the systemic sexual violence waged on children and teens, but because it reveals the deliberate sacrifice of vulnerable population groups who in theory should be able to count on the protection of the administrative state. Instead, institutions operating under a calculated bureaucratic plan offer poor and working-class adolescents up as sacrifices to the altar of multiculturalism.
For over a decade in towns like Rotherham, Rochdale, and Telford, young native British girls—some as young as eleven—were groomed, drugged, raped, and trafficked by networks of immigrant men from East Asia. The young girls were first love-bombed with gifts and flattery, then lured into private spaces—plied with alcohol and pills—then passed between grown men who raped them repeatedly. Sometimes lines of abusers waited their “turn” to ravage these teens in a manner that merely describing here would provide the reader with images so harrowing that they’re impossible to forget.
Girls who physically resisted their rapists were beaten and threatened with death. Some resistors were threatened with guns, others doused in gasoline with the captors threatening to burn them alive. Some were thrown from moving vehicles. If all this weren’t insane enough, the families who reported the crimes were firebombed by the perpetrators. Those who continued to contact authorities had their windows smashed and often faced further threats of arson.
For years, UK authorities resisted doing anything to address this mass sexual terror inflicted on children. Why? Well, every educated Western liberal person knows exactly why. Because some things are unsayable. To acknowledge the horrific crimes committed against young girls would also mean acknowledging the ethnic and religious backgrounds of their attackers, which might in turn suggest that not all foreign cultures are automatically compatible with the basic norms of Western civilization. And then what?
More:
Local whistleblowers were silenced. Parents who begged for help were warned not to stoke communal tensions.
These were working-class Brits—without lawyers, media platforms, or political connections—and they were left hung out to dry merely for getting caught up in an episode embarrassing to elites’ multiculturalist ideology.
This is just as damning as damning gets:
The destruction of working-class girls’ lives was written off as collateral damage in the state’s pursuit of a fictional future: that of consequence-free multicultural harmony. Their loyalty to this dream overrode all practical concerns—even the duty to protect under-age girls from gang rape. The victims were betrayed not only by their abusers, but by the dominant ideals of their own society: a once-serious Western civilization now ruled by babbling freaks pushing a superficial moral code that instructs adolescents not to judge potential predators, so long as their skin tone or religion aligns with post-colonial grievance narratives.
What happens when the people of a country wake up to the fact that the people who govern them, both within public and private institutions, hate them? Hate them so much that they’re willing to allow their daughters and sisters to be gang-raped, even in one case heard by Lowe’s team, a dog?
If they get away with this, then Britain is a conquered nation. All that’s left are the formalities of power’s handover. The Los Angeles writer Peachy Keenan says:
Are Americans being told about any of this by the US media? I bet not. Do you know about France’s Charlie Kirk, Quentin Deranque, murdered by a leftist gang for opposing mass migration? French authorities are doing what their US authorities declined to do after Kirk’s murder: going after Antifa and violent leftists. Good.
