You are right, Linda. Trump is a disappointment yet he is a product of our degenerate culture. Pro-lifers should accept that Trump is 90 % on our side on abortion. Kamala Harris is 100 % against us.
You are right, Linda. Trump is a disappointment yet he is a product of our degenerate culture. Pro-lifers should accept that Trump is 90 % on our side on abortion. Kamala Harris is 100 % against us.
Right. He doesn't believe in fidelity either. He's on his third wife and is a proven adulterer with the wife is still married to. He's got all the morals of an alley cat. And he's on our side most of the time. Sort of like Jean Lafitte helping out Andrew Jackson at the Battle of New Orleans.
Proven by who...the sham courts of NYC? Are you vote for Pope in Nov? The lawfare and the policy of the progressive left should be enough to make any rational person hold their nose and vote for Trump.
Is there any doubt that Trump is serial cheater? Go ahead and respond "That should have no political import"-- I would agree with you (and thought the same about Bill Clinton). But don't deny the facts. Trump is not a saint (and maybe we shouldn't want a saint to be president)
Heck, even the 2nd husband was banging his kids' nanny during his first marriage. And now the MSM is calling him a sex symbol and icon of non-toxic masculinity.
For all we know, Trump is as chaste as can be. He TALKS a great deal in crude terms and has cultivated his alley cat image very assiduously. But when I see someone like him with a very remunerative material interest in his image, I begin to wonder a bit.
Paying off porn stars is the kind of thing that someone in his particular position would be likely to do just to make them go away. Also, doing so is in itself a great way to enhance one’s intended reputation as a cad. Trump made Stormy Daniels a part of his act. Who, after all, is such a player that he can ACTUALLY DENY SLEEPING WITH A PLAYBOY BUNNY?
I find the typical moral analysis of Trump’s behavior to be naive and jejune, moreso even than the kind of sexual imagination one’s aged spinster second grade teacher might have had.
I think it’s entirely possible that Trump has been far less of a cad than people think he is. I wouldn’t bet on it, but the chances are not zero.
I don’t buy anything that happened in the New York court system as meaningful in any way. That system is corrupt to the core, with naked partisan bias and barely concealed glee at getting Trump on any of the flimsiest grounds possible. The prosecutors and the judges involved need to spend serious time in prison for their blatant abuse of their own powers.
Obviously these judicial disciplinary actions should occur only after the due appeals processes have run their courses. But strong, decisive and bipartisan action MUST be taken at some point soon to halt the politicization of our judiciary. We no longer have the rule of law at that point.
If the 90% is a problem for his ambition, he’ll betray that too. Years before he got axed by Henry VIII, St. Thomas More’s son in law complimented him on his friendship with H8, specifically how he’d walk around with More with his arm around More’s neck. More responded that “if my neck would purchase him a castle in France, it would not fail to go.” We know how that turned out.
Choosing an evil is NEVER a "moral" choice. Sometimes it's necessary, but evils remain evils. Necessity does not baptize them. And it's not necessary in this election as there are other possible choices.
You are right, Linda. Trump is a disappointment yet he is a product of our degenerate culture. Pro-lifers should accept that Trump is 90 % on our side on abortion. Kamala Harris is 100 % against us.
At best, Trump doesn’t care one way or the other.
Right. He doesn't believe in fidelity either. He's on his third wife and is a proven adulterer with the wife is still married to. He's got all the morals of an alley cat. And he's on our side most of the time. Sort of like Jean Lafitte helping out Andrew Jackson at the Battle of New Orleans.
Proven by who...the sham courts of NYC? Are you vote for Pope in Nov? The lawfare and the policy of the progressive left should be enough to make any rational person hold their nose and vote for Trump.
Is there any doubt that Trump is serial cheater? Go ahead and respond "That should have no political import"-- I would agree with you (and thought the same about Bill Clinton). But don't deny the facts. Trump is not a saint (and maybe we shouldn't want a saint to be president)
Yes, definitely not the first sex addict we've had in the White House, probably not the last
Heck, even the 2nd husband was banging his kids' nanny during his first marriage. And now the MSM is calling him a sex symbol and icon of non-toxic masculinity.
Where is National Lampoon when we need it? MAD Magazine wouldn't be too bad, but for this tale National Lampoon would have a harder bite.
For all we know, Trump is as chaste as can be. He TALKS a great deal in crude terms and has cultivated his alley cat image very assiduously. But when I see someone like him with a very remunerative material interest in his image, I begin to wonder a bit.
Paying off porn stars is the kind of thing that someone in his particular position would be likely to do just to make them go away. Also, doing so is in itself a great way to enhance one’s intended reputation as a cad. Trump made Stormy Daniels a part of his act. Who, after all, is such a player that he can ACTUALLY DENY SLEEPING WITH A PLAYBOY BUNNY?
I find the typical moral analysis of Trump’s behavior to be naive and jejune, moreso even than the kind of sexual imagination one’s aged spinster second grade teacher might have had.
I think it’s entirely possible that Trump has been far less of a cad than people think he is. I wouldn’t bet on it, but the chances are not zero.
I don’t buy anything that happened in the New York court system as meaningful in any way. That system is corrupt to the core, with naked partisan bias and barely concealed glee at getting Trump on any of the flimsiest grounds possible. The prosecutors and the judges involved need to spend serious time in prison for their blatant abuse of their own powers.
Obviously these judicial disciplinary actions should occur only after the due appeals processes have run their courses. But strong, decisive and bipartisan action MUST be taken at some point soon to halt the politicization of our judiciary. We no longer have the rule of law at that point.
Analogy of the week. Congrats.
I have a lot more respect for Lafitte than Trump.
Lafitte never used ketchup on steak.
I don't either.
If the 90% is a problem for his ambition, he’ll betray that too. Years before he got axed by Henry VIII, St. Thomas More’s son in law complimented him on his friendship with H8, specifically how he’d walk around with More with his arm around More’s neck. More responded that “if my neck would purchase him a castle in France, it would not fail to go.” We know how that turned out.
Absolutely!
And to repeat something I posted a couple of days ago:
https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/trump-lesser-two-evils-is-moral-choice/
Choosing an evil is NEVER a "moral" choice. Sometimes it's necessary, but evils remain evils. Necessity does not baptize them. And it's not necessary in this election as there are other possible choices.