Mostly for the metaphysics and the Liturgy and the Eucharist, I guess. I phenomenologically drift to where the magic's at. And I'm Eastern Catholic—not a fan of Rome.
Most of my epistemology is from Kierkegaard and has to do with the axiomatic nature of what we consider final authority: at some point, we must choose a thing we cannot prove. And on that front, I could be described as an intuitionist.
Very Protestant understanding of the Church you've got. Makes me wonder why you're Catholic.
Mostly for the metaphysics and the Liturgy and the Eucharist, I guess. I phenomenologically drift to where the magic's at. And I'm Eastern Catholic—not a fan of Rome.
I would have thought that epistemology would figure in there somewhere.
Most of my epistemology is from Kierkegaard and has to do with the axiomatic nature of what we consider final authority: at some point, we must choose a thing we cannot prove. And on that front, I could be described as an intuitionist.
I've never read Kierkegaard, but that looks spot-on to me. Basically it comes down to that you have to start somewhere.
He is the greatest philosopher who ever lived—and he’s also a lot of fun. Check out the editions from Princeton UP, translated by the Hongs.