You absolutely created your usual strawman, since my comment about AI understanding was made AFTER your strawman argument.
Yes, what I consider to be the strange/incredible aspect of AI is it's able to "understand" in a reasonable sense of the concept of understanding. Yet, it is not conscious awareness in the sense of the usual human app…
You absolutely created your usual strawman, since my comment about AI understanding was made AFTER your strawman argument.
Yes, what I consider to be the strange/incredible aspect of AI is it's able to "understand" in a reasonable sense of the concept of understanding. Yet, it is not conscious awareness in the sense of the usual human application of that phrase.
We've both made our points, so I'm not engaging with you further (which is my default mode with you that I regret leaving).
Jon isn’t wrong that chatpots have AI technology. However, it is generative AI chat bots like GPT-4 that people are talking (concerned) about because this technology (and quality varies based on a host of factors) has the ability, unlike a conventional chatbot, to not only train itself using prompts and trainers, but created new multi-modal content.
You absolutely created your usual strawman, since my comment about AI understanding was made AFTER your strawman argument.
Yes, what I consider to be the strange/incredible aspect of AI is it's able to "understand" in a reasonable sense of the concept of understanding. Yet, it is not conscious awareness in the sense of the usual human application of that phrase.
We've both made our points, so I'm not engaging with you further (which is my default mode with you that I regret leaving).
Jon isn’t wrong that chatpots have AI technology. However, it is generative AI chat bots like GPT-4 that people are talking (concerned) about because this technology (and quality varies based on a host of factors) has the ability, unlike a conventional chatbot, to not only train itself using prompts and trainers, but created new multi-modal content.