2 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

I'm basically aligned with your view here, though I will go a step further and say my thinking re 9/11 has shifted in the past couple years from assuming betrayal at that level is too implausible, to thinking—given evidence I've become aware of—it's more likely than not. One thing I will never forget, watching on TV as those towers fell, was my clear thought: "How did they set those charges??!!" My gut that day told me I was witnessing a deliberate implosion, but for twenty years I denied my lying eyes and went with the official story of "pancaking layers" that elides (hides?) the significant forensic evidence of explosives. With the facts I'm aware of now, it's just the "who dunnit" in my mind that has changed.

Expand full comment

I guess that I'm somewhat noncommittal about it because I already expect the worst from them: even if they didn't do it, I fully believe that they're capable of having done it. So in that sense, the truth wouldn't change how I see them.

Expand full comment